28 Responses to “The One Lens Wedding Results!”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. Travis, cool! Of course it can be done with one lens… an outdoor wedding would allow you to get behind the bridal party as there is no altar… if it were in a church, I’d get in the second pew or something, then to the back.

    There is still a variety of shots and angles, and I can see you are pretty physically flexible to obtain all these different perspectives.

    I want to steal that garter shot from you – never thought until now to shoot down the leg toward the groom. Thanks!

    On the Student forum, Neil VN and Steve Z give great discussion about offering the different focal lengths and perspectives, and for the most part they are correct.

    Your wedding coverage shows that we can strip it down and go back to basics, the one-lens, one-camera method.

    I was a weekend warrior from my first wedding in 1996. Before I went digital in 2005, most of my weddings were shot with two Nikon 5005 bodies, both with the cheap 35-70mm f/3.3-4.5 lenses. At least these were zooms! From there, I shot mostly primes on other Nikon bodies and a Mamiya 645E. But at least I had a variety of focal lengths.

    So I say bravo! And, don’t do it again!! J/K… it was a great way to stimulate some activity on the Student forum.

    Thank you so much!

    Now I’m looking for an idea, like shooting a complete wedding w/o flash…

    Do you have any more ideas?

    Phillip

  2. Wow!
    One lens.
    One light lens.
    No flash, no foamy thingy on it, no radio transmitter to trigger other flashes, no bracket.

    Yup, that is the way to do it. And this way you can actually move around since you don’t have 15lbs hanging on your neck :-)

    The only thing is that Nikon’s 1.4 is manual focus and for a fast pace wedding that would be tough.

    Great photos!

    Motti

  3. Obi

    Think you did pretty well with the one lens. Been planning to do this for while now, but havent found an appropriate wedding victim for it

  4. Awesome job! And I’m so proud to say that I own this lens, I really love it!

  5. Mrs. cooper

    Great!! JoB!

  6. Liz

    Amazing work. So inspirational!

  7. Great post. Lovely results. Were the vignetting done in post or out of the camera?
    I shot my first digital wedding with one lens the canon 50mm 1.4 and it turned out great. I did not use any flash or other means main reason because I do not own a lot of lenses and as you said in the post it is about walking around a lot looking for situations that with a zoom you might have missed. I loved shooting with one lens no stress when to switch and with 1.4 you have enough light (sometimes even to much) to get great shows.

  8. I disagree with just using one lens for a (paid) wedding, but agree with the principle, the lens choice and love the photos you posted. Doubly “gutsy” if you didn’t have a backup body or at least had some duct tape if it malfunctioned :)

  9. Hey Phat, thanks for the comment. I think it’s absolutely crucial to have plenty of back-ups. I had several at my disposal just in case something went wrong. Remember two is one and one is none! ;)

    Travis

  10. Hi Mireille, I actually did most of the vignetting in lightroom. I do most of my editing in LR and rarely use photoshop anymore. Although I do use ps when a print order is placed, and for the album.

  11. Wow!
    I’m so impressed, you did an amazing jog in a single wedding with one and only lens.

    I also love fast lens like that, you just can’t go wrong.

    Awesome jog, keep up.

  12. Philip W.

    The images look great but why did you add a vignette to nearly every picture?
    I personally think that the vignette is too much on many pictures and it looks like your lens or camera somehow isn’t working right.

  13. I really like many of these photos you’ve taken, very creative and beautifully done. As a recent Twitter link noted, it isn’t the equipment so much as it is the operator (I saw a great photo shoot done with an iPhone, yeah!). I will probably try to incorporate some of these shots into the next wedding I shoot (though I do carry more than one lens).

    Very inspiring post and photos (and it doesn’t hurt that the bride is rather attractive, does it?).

  14. Excellent shots! I sent you a reply in Twitter, however I think I answered my own question. Working with one lens, especially a Prime, will definitely make you move around more. However, for the first few weddings would you suggest using at least one zoom? For instance, your shot of the first kiss, I would die if that was the only one I got. I would definitely want something close up for that shot, and that either takes planning or a good telephoto, or both.

    @Motti, the Nikon 35mm f/1.4 is a manual lens, true, why not use the 50mm f/1.4 instead which is a manual/auto lens and which one a medium frame camera gives you the 35mm equivalent?

  15. Carmen I

    I am just getting into portraits and need to start with some off-camera lighting. What type of equipment would you suggest for someone with a Canon Rebel T2i?

    By the way–I loved this post. Shows that the artist trumps the big equipment!

  16. ebphoto

    great to see the results of this challenge. Currently, I would not dare to do it, so you have my utmost respect for this. Great lighting too, as you said, I did not notice distortion with the closer portraits. Love the vignette. I’m sure your clients will be delighted!

  17. ebphoto

    So, what will be your next challenge?

  18. Hi there Travis..i really enjoyed and love your photography..this one is really good and the explanation is detail..for me in wedding events i would used two lens..and man it is heavy…i just used the standard lens and planning to get a faster lens by next year..for me, distortion doesnt really matter, how distort it is it art..photogrphy is all about art..and your photography is great..:)..im not a professional like you, but i usually do wedding photos for my closes frens as they request ..still got many to learn,but im loving my part time job..:)

  19. Travis, a rgeat piece and a very enjoyable read. I’m just getting into weddings and did my first shoot for a friend last weekend. Being a typical newbie I took far to much gear but funnily enough due to the low light and not wanting to dazzle everyone with flash i opted for my Samynag 35/1.4 MF on the D700 and 14/2.8 Samyang MF on the D90. The 35mm is indeed a great length though i did swap to my Samyang 85/1.4 MF for speeches. i did find it tough with MF to get lots of crisp shots at high ISO but my main school boy error was being too used to stills so using 1/30 s/s only to forget the people are all moving. I really want another wedding asap to give in another go. I still got some nice shots and only covered the 2nd half of the day so the couple will not be without photos.

    Thanks again for sharing
    Matt

  20. Hi Travis,

    Thank you for being awesome! I have shot weddings for over 3 years now & use this concept of the one lens. It does allow you to be a true artist & make sure that every client has unique images. I do the photography on the side so the husband hates when I get a new lens. But this one is a must! I hate going to a wedding & seeing it look like a photoshoot! Glad to know someone out there believes that less can mean more!

  21. this is amazing and exactly what i was looking for. I still cant believe you were able to pull it off with one lens. Ive done about 7 weddings, still learning, but i find that i use the zoom as a crutch. I love macro photography and with the zoom i have a tendancy of taking lots of close up or tight shots.
    I may try to pick up a very fast prime lens or two and see how i like it. Maybe it will get me to shoot a little wider and like you wrote, get me to walk around and find more interesting shots.
    I use a d7000 and have a 35mm 1.8, but might look into something wider. Im also amazed at how sharp your images are.
    Just awesome.

  22. myd7000

    Sarah.
    I just looked at your website and you do good work. I noticed that you start your wedding packages at $1,000 including an engagment session. I see that you do this on the side, but I think with your experience you are undercharging. Nice site though!

  23. Thanks for the Kind words Tomas. The canon 35 is a super sharp lens, especially when it’s set to about 4.5 or so aperture. The best way to learn is to get out of your comfort zone.

    Travis

  24. $1000 is a starting price, our wedding sales with albums and e-sessions average around $7,000. It’s all about up-sale, and making your clients happy.

    Travis

  25. Lovely work. We’re fans of doing more with less, and this is inspiration of what’s possible in wedding photography. Thanks Travis : D

  26. Nice work and an inspirational article. I use a 24-70 f2.8 and my beloved 85 f1.2 but your article has encouraged me to try and favour a 35 instead of the zoom. I feel my neck breathing a sigh of relief !